Trust, scored.

ONPROOF is an independent token rating platform. Each review produces a single composite grade (A–F) and an underlying 0–100 score derived from the same 35-indicator rubric, regardless of token class. The methodology is disclosed in advance — weights and thresholds are not retroactively changed, and every report is sealed at review time with a snapshot of the rubric version it was scored against.

The methodology rests on three commitments:

• Pre-disclosure. All weights and indicator definitions are public before a review begins. Reviews cannot be silently re-scored under a new rubric.
• Provenance. Every indicator value is backed by a verifiable data source (explorer, GitHub, disclosure feed) captured at snapshot time.
• Reproducibility. Two reviewers applying the rubric to the same token at the same block height must produce the same grade. Ambiguous indicators are scored neutral rather than guessed.

Composite scores map to letter grades as follows. Category-level grades use the same scale.

Category weights reflect each dimension's share of the composite score. Contract safety and holder distribution carry the heaviest weight because they directly affect downside risk; online presence and token economy alignment are lighter because they correlate with — but do not cause — risk.

Each category groups a small set of indicators that together describe a single dimension of risk or quality. Indicators are scored on a 0–5 scale and aggregated by simple weighted average within the category.

Each indicator is evaluated against an explicit rubric documented per indicator on the Token Report (Methodology & Data Snapshot section). The status determines the points contribution within the indicator's 0–5 scale:

Indicators marked N/A are excluded from the denominator, so a token isn't penalised for a dimension that doesn't apply. Indicators marked Neutral are observed but not scored.

• Default refresh cadence: every 30 days, or on-event when a material change is detected (audit published, security incident, major governance vote, LP unlock).
• Sealed snapshots: each report preserves the methodology version, indicator values, and data sources at review time. Re-reviews produce new reports rather than overwriting old ones.
• Appeals: token issuers and third parties may file disputes via Contact Us. Appeals must cite the specific indicator(s) and propose an alternative value with supporting evidence. The independent committee reviews each appeal within 14 days.